OBAMA’S FEAR OF ARMED CITIZENS – ROOTED IN A PSYCHOPATHIC DISORDER?

NewImage

Joseph Farah wrote a MUST READ article earlier this week called “WHY DOES OBAMA FEAR ARMED CITIZENRY?” While he logically deconstructs Obama recent anti-gun speech in Colorado, it is much more than an elegant retort. Farah actually makes an implicit case that the President is suffering from a psychopathic disorder.

To begin, Farah noted that Obama has consistently misrepresent the very reason the Bill of Rights includes a specific protection of the unalienable right to bear arms. Interesting – a point not overlooked at Second Amendment Patriots. But Obama also lied about his own personal position, which is clearly for the ban of most firearms currently owned by Americans. Again, interesting. Because of these extraordinary inaccurate statements about gun ownership, Farah believed the President’s own words needed to be thoroughly refuted. Well, by most accounts, he did just that.

For those that did not hear Obama’s speech in Colorado earlier this week, here is a portion of what he said:

The opponents of some of these common-sense laws have ginned up fears among responsible gun owners that have nothing to do with what’s being proposed, nothing to do with the facts, but feeds into this suspicion about government. You hear some of these quotes:

I’ need a gun to protect myself from the government.’

‘We can’t do background checks because the government’s going to come take my guns away.’

“The government’s us,” Obama continued. “These officials are elected by you. They are elected by you, I am elected by you. I am constrained as they are constrained by a system that our founders put in place. This is a government of and by and for the people. So surely we can have a debate that’s not based on the notion somehow that your elected representatives are trying to do something to you other than potentially prevent another group of families from grieving the way the families of Aurora or Newtown or Columbine have grieved. We’ve got to get past some of the rhetoric that gets perpetuated that breaks down trust and is so over the top that it just shuts down all discussion. And it’s important for all of us when we hear that talk to say ‘hold on a second.’ If there are any folks out there right now who are gun owners and you’ve been hearing that someone is taking away your guns, get the facts! We’re not proposing a gun registration system. We’re proposing background checks for criminals. Don’t just listen to what some advocates or folks who have an interest in this are saying. Look at the actual legislation. That’s what happened here in Colorado. And hopefully if we know the facts and we’re listening to each other, then we can actually move forward.”

Farah effectively argues that Obama “makes light of the argument that free citizens have a right and duty to be armed and vigilant to protect their liberty – including from government.” But as we know, this is exactly what the founding fathers and ratified the Second Amendment believed.

It doesn’t take a Harvard graduate to research a few basis facts about our constitution and second amendment. SIDE BAR:  Did you know that in 2008 Obama surrendered license to practice law in order to escape insurance fraud charges? You didn’t! Interesting the press never reported that.

Back to the main point, here are a few historical proof points that support the facts around our constitutional basis:

NewImage

James Madison wrote in the Federalist Papers: “Americans have the right and advantage of being armed – unlike the citizens of other countries whose governments are afraid to trust the people with arms.”

Thomas Jefferson wrote in a proposal for the Virginia Constitution: “No Free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.”

James Madison wrote in support of the Second Amendment: “The right of the people to keep and bear … arms shall not be infringed. A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country. …”

George Mason said: “… to disarm the people – that was the best and most effectual way to enslave them.”

Noah Webster wrote: “Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom of Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any bands of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States.”

Alexander Hamilton wrote in the Federalist Papers: “… but if circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude, that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people, while there is a large body of citizens, little if at all inferior to them in discipline and use of arms, who stand ready to defend their rights. …”
Samuel Adams said: “The Constitution shall never be construed … to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms.”

Richard Henry Lee, the initiator of the Declaration of Independence and a member of the Senate that passed the Bill of Rights, wrote: “To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of people always possess arms, and be taught alike especially when young, how to use them.”

NewImage

Alexander Hamilton wrote in the Federalist Papers: “The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed.”

Thomas Jefferson wrote in a letter quoted frequently by leftists of the 1960s and 1970s: “And what country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not warned from time to time that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. … The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants.”

Patrick Henry said: “Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined.”

The indisputable intent of our founding fathers in constructing the Second Amendment was to ensure the people of the United States retained their God given natural rights of self protection and to thwart any suppressive actions of a future tyrannical government. To argue against this point is to argue against the facts of history itself.

But Obama goes on to also argues that he is not supportive of gun bans. This is yet another premeditated lie, another typical psychopathic behavior, which is supported by the following facts that where also revealed by Farah:

In 1996, while still in Chicago, Obama supported a ban on handguns.

In 1998, he supported a ban on all semiautomatic guns, which represent the vast majority of firearms currently owned by citizens in the U.S. In 2004, he advocated banning gun sales within five miles of a school or park (essentially a ban on virtually all gun stores).

He served on the board of directors of the Joyce Foundation, the largest private funder of research seeking ways to ban gun ownership in the U.S.

— When Obama ran for the Illinois state Senate, he responded “Yes” when asked by Independent Voters of Illinois if he supported a “ban [on] the manufacture, sale and possession of handguns.”

—  Obama is also on record in opposition to current laws in 48 states permitting citizens to carry concealed handguns for protection. About concealed carry laws.

— In March 2004, Barack Obama was one of the 20 state senators voting against Senate Bill 2165, a law with provisions designed to assert a right of citizens to protect themselves against home invasions so that self-defense requirements would take precedence over local ordinances against handgun possession.

Farah research into Obama’s deceptive practices is more than just a rebuttal of his Colorado speech. It begins to shine a light on psychology of the President’s very own mind set and the event disorders therein. As in the case of most psychopaths, do not pay attention to Obama’s words, for they are designed to misdirect and deceive. Instead, we must pay close attention to the President does, for just like the psychopath, he must remain physically consistent with his believes and is incapable of doing otherwise.

Advertisements


Categories: History, Politics

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

1 reply

  1. The 2nd amendment was NOT about “hunting.” Got that libatards. It’s very important that you GET that. In fact, it is crucial that you GET THAT. The 2nd amendment was written in 1776. 1776. Now you tell me…..who did NOT hunt in 1776? And so the 2nd amendment was very, very carefully worded. Why? Because our Founding Fathers were in the midst of fighting a war against a TYRANNICAL government. The British attempt to confiscate guns from the colonists is what STARTED the American Revolution: the 1774 import ban on firearms and gunpowder; the 1774-75 confiscations of firearms and gunpowder; and the use of violence to effectuate the confiscations. It was these events that changed a situation of political tension into a shooting war. Each of these British abuses provides insights into the scope of the modern Second Amendment. Don’t believe me? Go look it up, I’ll wait. Got that part now? OK, so the term “…shall NOT BE INFRINGED.” That means ALL GUN LAWS are unconstitutional! In 1776, you could own cannons, war ships, the best muskets (more commonly know as GUNS) whatever you could afford. You think the framers of the constitution did NOT consider that? Of course they did! The Revolutionary War was not won with government military alone. In fact, the war would have been lost if that was the case. The war was won with common, run of the mill everyday American citizens WITH GUNS! Their OWN guns……and cannons and ships and ammo. Lots and lots of ammo. Our Founding Fathers KNEW the importance then and for the future of the RIGHT and were wise enough to provide the MEANS of the American people to DEFEND OURSELVES against a tyrannical government. Including OUR OWN. Here’s a footnote to history for you: The Emperor of Japan during WW2, refused to invade mainland America. Why? Because as he stated, there would be a gun behind every blade of grass. While it may be true no one is trying to ban all guns…….YET. That’s not the way these people operate. No, they rob us of our liberties just a little at time, so as no one will really notice. I’ve come to the conclusion that we do NOT need assault weapons to hunt. No, we need assault weapons to defend ourselves against ANY who would dictate our way of life, rob us of our GOD-Given liberties or attempt to enslave us in any way, shape or form. That’s some other government (foreign) or our own (domestic). Law abiding, Americans don’t need more gun laws. We are already keeping the unconstitutional gun laws. Your run of the mill criminal, pay NO MIND to any gun laws so that MORE LAWS will NOT affect them either. They simple ignore them. You will always have insane people who do insane things. The nut job that murdered those precious children in Newtown, Conn….was NOT a law abiding citizen. In fact, he obviously had to commit an illegal act to get them. He killed his own Mother and took them…..ILLEGALLY! You may say if she didn’t have them, he couldn’t have gotten them. I disagree. If this guy KILLED and then stole from his own Mother, I don’t see that he would have any problem killing someone else to get them. It’s that simple. Answer me this: What would have happened if just ONE of the law abiding citizens in that school on that day had NOT been legislated OUT of their RIGHT to defend and protect themselves??? In words libatards can understand: What would have happened if just ONE of the teachers carried concealed that day??? You trust them with your children but you can’t trust them to carry a gun to protect those children? (Libatard logic!) My husband and I own assault weapons. We have 3 daughters (2 still under 18) who have all been trained to use them properly. We have owned them for many, many years and we have NEVER killed anyone along with MILLIONS of other American gun owners who also didn’t kill anyone. With certain legislative efforts by this regime it is painfully obvious to those of us who are awake, that there are those who do NOT understand the purpose of the 2nd amendment and would take ALL guns given the opportunity. Sadly, an awful lot of them are sitting on their asses in seats of authority in D.C., drawing a fat paycheck, getting rich and passing unconstitutional “laws” while America BURNS. Have people never heard of NDAA signed by this muslim-fraud? Look into it. Its a real eye-opener. Yes, I need assault weapons and NO, NOT for hunting. I need semi-automatic assault weapons because MY GOVERNMENT has fully automatic assault weapons! And it’s very clear to me that “my” government can NOT be trusted! MOLON LABE!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: